|
Last update of this
page : 30/06/2004
Reduction
techniques and costs
Sulphur
oxides (SOx)
In certain cases, it will be technically
possible to implement several solutions for reducing the same pollutant
at a given industrial facility. In other cases, only one technique
will be effective in maintaining emissions at the desired level.
Sulphur oxide emissions to air mainly
come from the combustion of fossil fuels containing variable proportions
of sulphur (0.5% to 3% for oil and 0.5% to 10% for coal). Natural
gas contains practically no sulphur.
Sulphur removal techniques may be applied
at three levels, before, during
or after combustion.
Action before combustion (focusing on the fuel)
As SO2 emissions
are directly related to the sulphur content of the fuel used, the
first solution is, where possible, to use fuel with a lower sulphur
content. For example, it is now possible to find heavy fuel oils
with less than 0.5% sulphur content. The effectiveness of such a
measure is a direct result of a lower sulphur content of the fuel.
However, these fuels are more expensive and given the stringent
levels of emissions laid down by regulations, these measures are
not always suitable.
Action during and after combustion
This type of
sulphur removal is based on the injection of a (calcic) alkali to
reduce the sulphur oxides formed during combustion. The main parameters
on which the success of this type of treatment largely depend are
:
- nature of
the calcic chemical and the Ca/S ratio
- temperature
- specific
surfaces and granular structure of the reagent
Action during combustion (in the furnace)
Combustion on sulphur-removing fluidised beds (gas/solid reaction)
This depends on the coal being suspended
during combustion and the injection of an alkaline chemical at the
same time to ensure a reduction in the sulphur oxides by a neutralising
reaction. This technique yields a good gas/solid exchange. Certain
facilities recirculate the fuel and the reagent which provides increased
yield from the reaction.
Effectiveness 80-90%. Ca/S: typically 3-4 and 1.5-2 for circulating
beds.
This technique also reduces the formation of NOx because of the
lower temperature obtained by keeping the fuel fluidised.
The injection
of alkaline chemicals into the flame (gas/solid reaction)
Here the reagent is injected directly into the combustion
furnace. Effectiveness: 60%. Ca/S: 3-4
These two techniques,
which require relatively low temperatures, help to reduce the formation
of NOx in a proportion of 40-50%.
Action after combustion (focusing on the combustion
gases)
This type of
treatment is based mainly on neutralising reactions between SO2
and the basic substances (CaCO3 Ca(OH)2, CaO, MgCO3, Na2CO3, Na2SO3,
NH3, etc.).
There are three
different types of treatment: wet, semi-dry and dry processes.
Wet
processes (gas/liquid reaction)
After removing dust from the gases of combustion, they are
brought into contact with a solution containing the reagent. The
solution is pulverised to increase the efficiency of the reaction
with the neutralising agent. Effectiveness: 95% Ca/S: 1-1.5
Semi-dry
processes (gas/liquid reaction)
The neutralising solution is sprayed into the waste gas. The hot
fumes cause the water to evaporate from the solution, and the result
of the reaction is in the form of a dry dust. Effectiveness: 80-90%
Ca/S: 1.5
Dry processes
(gas/solid reaction)
The neutralising reagent is injected directly into the flow
of waste gases. The products of the reaction are separated out on
a bag filter. During this filtration, the neutralising reaction
continues. Effectiveness: 40-60% Ca/S: 2-3

Principle of the dry bicarbonate process
|
|
Investment
|
Operating
cost
|
Effectiveness
|
|
Wet
|
+++
|
+++
|
95%
|
|
Semi-dry
|
++
|
++
|
80-90%
|
|
Dry
|
+
|
+++
|
40-60%
|
|
Orders
of magnitude concerning the cost of these processes
|
|